TWO NATURAL
THE WORLD-OF-THE-WORLD
(Reviews of suffering, aprons)
Chapter VII
BASES AND judge the value of existence.
The point has been discussed above - the nature of a review of conditions relating to the world - the world's life and the endowments of the discussion has only been in place objective opinions only. That is, in which I tried to avoid referring to the value of it is how much to ask of people, so the results, the observation that the net aimed at the convenience for the theory only smart but absolutely did not say y on legal appearance of the Buddha. Because of legal seminars, Buddha did not mention the value judgments that specialize in proving the truth Xien pure, so to speak, not a place that not so, that is the position of the Buddha and therefore that Buddhism is purely a religious rather than a scientist, and purpose of Buddhism is to take all the guess the valuable work to make the supreme ideal of man. So here, after the office, need to talk to the judge the value of the real to clarify its religious significance, because Buddhism is a religion based on moral mission took reasonable basis, therefore, stand in terms of the fact that said, it is a doctrine candles are extremely critical.
Endowed this world, for the requirements of human values and meaning what? Reviews by the value of the Buddha can be summed up in one hour suffering (dukkha), that is, people can not trust completely in the world suffering: it is the best judge the value of all the texts. Standpoint that tells the history of humanity has not necessarily start from the Buddha that, at least have sprung up since about the age-Definition-mail Austria, time that people start comparing comparison between the ideal and reality, resulting from the movement arose hate reality and gradually infiltrated the whole world thought that the human Indian offices: this point I have presented elsewhere (1 ), ie, the survey of the Buddha, speaking on the history of ideas, nothing is just a continuation of the system was installed only.
(1) India-Study-Religion-Philosophy-Education-History, pp. 501-502,
Song, Buddha features a mineral policy it vehemently on the internal engine part of his mostly elderly to escape suffering, pain (illness), died, and his release is also protected free bi profitable patients suffering death benefits, all of which take the pain of life that centered founded Buddhism. (1) Therefore, the method Four-Truths, the world is endowed directly called Format-Truths, and the causal Cross II shall be taken to find out the conditions for creating e-aging benefits patients suffering brain as a starting point for The Dependent Origination. See then obviously we see the origin of Theravada Buddhism, we can say, is similar to the sex and number-Reviews-Na-Catholic States, that is, all aimed at a major issue is to address the suffering of human life.
Song, Buddha on the basis to judge what the world is suffering? The deep base will be presented in the next section, while the base is covered by short-sighted to judge the truth that has been said above, the main point is particularly impermanent (aniccata), selflessness ( anatta) etc. ...
(1) High-Ham 56, Bridge St. M. 26, Ariyapariyesana
According to Buddhism, all things are continuous flow. "France is impermanent (aniccata), being a legal variants (viparinamadhammata), is a destructive method (khayadhammata) " (1) is often said that before the Buddha nails and security instruction. Thegio (loka - the world) is a legal real damage, so they call the world.
"Why is called the world? - Bill-Qiu, since the so-called destructive world - lujjatiti tasma lokati warehouse "(2).
"The law passes, the Holy Law called the world - Yam repository Ananda palokodhamman viccati ariyassa vinaye ayam loko". (3)
So then, of course, Buddha has finally come to the conclusion that "all things destructive mutations are suffering" : the common attitude in the presentation of the Buddhist law. In the process of destroying any great variation, ie the flow does not stop it if people expect to live longer and keep going up forever can not be sure varies impermanent is suffering, but woe that, in the realms of human endowments, in fact, the impermanence variation is completely contrary to our expectations and desires of man, therefore, the master of it, can not get the pain.
(1) As M. 28 I. p. 185; High-function, 7. Also large enough
(2) S. IV, p, 52
(3) Ibid, page 53.
People, who would like ageless, living skeptical not die, who also wanted to honor wealth, but the blue youth soon became gray hair wrinkles, wealth and honor system goes well a horse through the window, fog early fall cuttings, in short, all of which are very often unavoidable variation, so it not contrary to our expectations of people waiting there? To put it even more closely in a moment, then also the birth and death every moment, so only a moment in time we do not have the true peace, so people looking for a calm and constant joy will not be satisfied? If standing on a comprehensive stance to say it, of course, one can not deny that there is pleasure, but if you get a permanent existence as an ideal to judge all the people also can not acknowledges that all insecurity, uncertainty, only to come to the conclusion in this world are all suffering: the communication would have to conclude that nature, because it is one of the reasons for cutting Why did the Buddha mean to judge the value world is suffering. See how the aphorism that "word of impermanence (anicca Sabbe sakhara) of the Buddha on the one hand give the judge the truth, while, on the other hand was telling the judge that value.
So-called "all is impermanent", standing in terms of judging the truth be told, is based on a negative constant falls also similar to the so-called "selflessness" and "word of impermanence" is particular reason to judge the value all is suffering. So, the Buddha, the so-called self is nothing but self-control point, but, if told "not true, which is usually the life" is, of course However, life does not have something called self-righteous at all, so, not-self, ie the loss of freedom that security is suffering.
"Then about five revered monk told that identity is not-self; if identity is not the best-self did not change in any way like that. For that sharp falls, but the identity was not falling, so sharp is unable to self. Therefore, the acceptance, perception, knowledge is self, if not the premier issue of selflessness they have not changed any way like that, and for which consumption falls, perception, knowledge, but that should not be falling consumption, perception, knowledge is not self.
Rate-Qiu Hey! According to him, the identity is often impermanent? - Bach Blessed! Is impermanent. All is impermanent suffering or happy? - Bach Blessed! Is suffering. In all the legal ports of departure is that suffering can find what is "our animals", as "the self" is not? - Bach Blessed! No! (1).
Meaning in the text above related to impermanence review, based on the one hand provide a review of the not-self, on the other hand, while standing on his stance, outlined the base led to judge the value life is suffering, which is very often where there is no autonomy, which has no autonomy, there is no I, one of us, there is no freedom of self, of ego: it is method of reasoning about suffering. Bottom line is get the absolute freedom of the one as the standard for judging. Again, As stated above, if the basis of Buddhist philosophy is man's destiny is ultimately only the will of the organisms by human operators but it seems to have autonomy, but it must be based on conditionality principle legal limit, but decided not unconditional. Furthermore, a consideration in other respects, the legal rules themselves self acceptance work (I work solely) for three consecutive life was tied to the loss of human freedom, therefore, in this world, man can not What we seek is the absolute autonomy. That a man always wanted to find that it is certainly not suffer it, hence the existence judge is suffering and therefore very plausible argument. Considering that this argument has been compiled and drawn from a review selflessness.
(1) Vinaya I, p. 100 (Journal-Ham 53, p. 513, see the common layman)
Reasons for the predictability exists is suffering but there are many, but the base is the largest base of impermanence, selflessness has been said above. All these reasons are found scattered in the business can be summed up into three conditions that its meaning is inductive-Cu in the following Sutra. (1)
"The issue is impermanent; to use the wisdom that you will see how boring and separated from all anguish. This is pure lead.
Acts are suffering; when using the wisdom that you will see how boring and deserted by anguish. This is pure lead. All measures are not-self; when using the wisdom that you will see how boring and separated from all anguish, which is pure lead. "
(Sabba sankhara ancca, ti pannaya passati Yada, atha nibbindati dukkhe, esa ti Maggo visuddhiya Sabbe sankkara dukha pannaya passati Yada, athe nibb-indati dukhe Maggo visuddhiya esa.
Sabba dhamma anatta ti pannaya passati Yada, atha nibbindati dukkhe, esa Maggo visuddhiya) (1).
Three things on here (the text of impermanence, selflessness legal text, words of pain) is truly the summary of an observer to the world of Buddha. But these three are also a Wednesday thing is that "all measures are not" to form the so-called "four cylinder concept" (Satipathana) which is a key doctrine in the most direct successor of the Buddhas. In the translation of the Dhammapada Seoul currently has four provisions. Unique in that so-called "No", standing in some ways to say it as described above, but involves judgments about the truth of the real truth, but standing at a different aspect, but said it is of value judgments. Coho in value, then all legal - Cleaning the judgments against the ideal way to limit the Supreme - are full, but that also means though is not employed, so get new ways not to do all. Therefore, the overall predictability of the Buddhist values of all measures will be suffering and not, ie including the full meaning and yet be miserable, but it does not.
(1) Matching Dhammapada, University Publishing, page 26.
But what we need to note this is: Suphan radical values, as noted above, largely comparative with supreme ideal, but decided not to take the float daily life as the standard. By A-Pi-Dalai-Lama has said in a transparent manner that all suffering is all glass saint's comments address that only shine. See the comments field of the Buddha saw the obvious place is the pessimistic comments. Only in one other aspect that says depression is the aim of Buddhism is perpetual light shine supreme ideal, not a desperate depression, that's what we need to recognize. If a superficial understanding that that's cynical of Buddhism is synonymous with the English word Pessamism it is very wrong, quite contrary to that of the Buddha's feet. Because the so-called pessimistic Buddhist ideal mainly aimed at high character and religious philosophy. As will be discussed in the following natural, as a Buddhist saint than any other saint in India which has confirmed reality in a very profound, especially living moral claim: that a obvious. In fact, the Buddha has done for the reason the world is suffering not only because he wanted to wake most people do not pay attention to life profound ideal, just eager to immerse immediate pleasure, not to seek meaning real life, people only know a spot fire in the cave is the only light that does not know that there are outside lights hang endless forest of temporal immortality.
Thus the Buddha was based on the impermanence, selflessness to predict all the suffering, in other words, all of them variations, which variations are not autonomous. Therefore, if failure is the opposite of the Buddhist ideal would be to actually be in a constant and in the implementation of the autonomy and true self. Assuming the comments field survey of the Buddha, if the real world is not very often variable and if the human ego can have absolute autonomy Buddha was not sure it is hard to predict, as no. Again, if you say one way to distinguish the ideal of Buddhism is often idealistic communications net falls, so guess the new reality is impermanent, selfless, is suffering, is not. See then that, historically, the ideal of Buddhism is still thought to originate from Saccidanandam (Sat = truth is, cit = mind, self, ananda = bliss), ie thought-Nga Pham in Austria- means-mail from the past (1). But for the Buddhist ideal that no normal relation to all value judgments, so that denies mental endowments Saccidanandam, always denied the existence of the self. Because, as the Buddha, the reality of the so-called pure, Pham and often fall through the well endowed not only desire, if not give evidence of the existence of such a reality is ultimately endowed it still is a wish, not to believe in the existence of it.
(1) On Saccidanandam, see Andorra school-Religion-Philosophy-Education-History, pp. 323-324; Six philosophical India, pages 638-640.
If any unsuspecting believe it's like mopping the poor would become rich range, raising the hope that virtual but then also feel happy, but then it came to the spring just a dream. So one can not build on what their ideal utopian platform like that to put it on a completely stance appeals to the truth of the fact: that the Buddhist principle that has relied on to More generally optimistic chain net and fell strongly that all impermanence initiated, dry, and selflessness. However, before the Buddha remains the ideal for a permanent, unchanging and self-control, even for endowments is not anymore, so people can reach a realm by himself opened, it is the realm of Nirvana; that is the most unusual of the Buddha. Later, the Mahayana Nirvana is the realm of all four common attributes, communication, self, the real net was derived from it, that is not the ideal realm separate from Buddhist center. This issue will be clear later, here's it only briefly.
Then if it a step further that the Buddha has studied why this ideal has been often, communication, self, pure? In this regard, standing on historically speaking, of course it leads starting from system-definition-mail Austria, but because the Buddha did not accept endowments should Nga Pham, theoretical, of course will be find grounds elsewhere. This problem only for the later Mahayana ideas are related, and for Theravada Buddhism franchise companies do not necessarily, however, here, we find it necessary to discuss the past.
According to Buddha, then all of them get "sex" as a basis and, although sales Buddha would not clear, but often based on psychological, communication, self, still can not find the net in training requirements, ie in ignorance . Considering the nature of ignorance, if seen from the active surface, which is the basis of education for life, is the impulse to satisfy the desires blindly, but, if that survey its content is meant in a way which implies a potentially life so deeply. As mentioned above, according to Buddhism, human sexuality was useful education (bhavatanha) towards the center of craving (Kamatanha) and prosperity education (vibhava) three. However, the activities of education, standing on a talk show that, although not outside the requirements of conservation and continuity of individual and race, great mineral instinct but, if nothing but the inner meaning of it is not reach the infinite life, which is ideal being permanent, common and absolute self-control constantly. Although unconscious action, and all creatures, especially humans, are not directly then indirectly, are taken as being the absolute ultimate goal to plan all: it is an undeniable truth wealth. (1) The common ideal of scholarly resources, communication, self, and get the ideal pure lives absolutely central to this work arises. If you combine them with three kinds of matter on which the survey is usually possible for a useful education that arise, Us is the craving that comes, Falls is due home from training (ie training and prosperity), but the starting point, but only with Pure purification shall be taken absolutely as other desires arising ideal.
(1) On the appearance of active desire; please visit Create Magazine Quality-1 and 2 "Addressing human desire to take as a basis."
Ordinary people, for the content of life, despite his ambition ideal, but it do not get the sense that only bound by the superficial work. Buddha, on the contrary, promoting profound inner meaning and use it as direct experience to achieve the ideal of human life supreme. Reference, which compares all the predictions can be summarized in a sentence like this, who are often bound by the primary education front, and then headed to Buddhist education to the general infinite, ie the training absolutely so. Later, the Mahayana teachings sure everyone has Buddha-nature, even told the Bodhi disturbing news have understood that it was reasonable. Because if you just look at the surface, desires but there is disturbing, but if you go deep into the meaning of its contents, then that is the Bodhi seek the infinite immortal. If all organisms have enough computer-power-like, the same can be said of all beings have Buddha-nature.
But, why in the Theravada Buddhism of desire is not confirmed, but before then are still negative. At about this problem for absolute beings, which usually ideal, ground, falls, pure as the leading departure desire, therefore, that standard was observed activities desire a reality, we see them complete contrast, which, if words they are relatively far apart. So although the ideal life completely but there is a greater desire distinctive, landscape ideal that life is permanent, then it is actually very common, although the ideal situation of pure desire, but life is not pure, ideal situation is where the absolute fulfillment, and desire is often not true fulfillment: the special nature of it. Simple words, in terms of relative desires reality and the ideal realm Thoan complete opposite, in which no one could compromise, therefore, ideal for people who want to find true can not by reality that is free: it is explicitly advocated by Buddhism.
However, if the opposite is the survey about the ideal situation which is so true desire stretching out, if the content of desire is the ideal situation implies that only renounced the true desire of living alone is not necessarily the ideal way done but, rather, a gradual approach to the realm of the ideal is to bar-net-user-upper-chemical and chemical activities a reality. Methodology The philosophy of Buddhism is an advocate present neo ordained, the other eye, very pure-informed of all activities with respect to ethics and religion is that it. If a step back to say it, the principle of "disturbing news Bodhi", said the current generation activities, which make perfect planes in the real world: that's the theory , "That body Buddhahood " of the later Mahayana.
To put it more understandable, the Buddha primarily based on the intrinsic meaning of education for public comments set of standards and ideals by which to observe and critique the real desire for it, standing on the stand the contrast of desire, that reality is impermanent is suffering, not, as not-self, the new judge life is impermanent is suffering, etc. ...
Again, the Buddha is known to be the origin of ignorance, if only to define it is senseless to explain the desire itself is not the direction to the true ideal of themselves but rely on the operation expression to form the world, so the new Buddha promote wisdom (panna - a bowl-out) and that is the path of true guidance; it relies on intellectual descendants see how big the ideal function in the context of desire, without the intellectual descendants can not get out of the world's chronic insecurity reincarnation of this uncertainty. Ideal method of implementation, given by the Four Truths, that the following two, but considering the twelve causal, then that is based on so-called "Removal of dependent origination" that.END=VIETNAMESE TRANSLATE ENGLISH BY BACH LIEN HOA.NAM MO SHAKYAMUNI BUDDHA.( 3 TIMES ).13/1/2012.
No comments:
Post a Comment